Pages

Sunday, 11 November 2012

The Chronicle: Team meeting # 2 (November 11th, 2012)

Today we interviewed our guest +Ivan Delchev about management, business, and marketing, and their relationship to psychology. Mr. Delchev is the co-founder and co-owner of Soft Consult Group, where he runs the Quality Assurance department. Mr. Delchev helped us by sharing his experience and bringing fresh ideas into our research. 

The group discussed certain ideas: 
  • possible rewards for the participants in our experiment (for instance: as least degrees to the end recipient, and so on)
  • the video’s optimal length and content (1:30)
  • possible ways of popularizing it through more social networks and media (other than Facebook)
  • getting recondition trough a number of organizations. 
We also considered the idea of getting sponsors to finance our project. Those ideas are still being worked out and refined, and we are still searching for other possible ways of expanding and improving our project.

I feel we've made significant progress today, by shedding light on ideas we've missed in our previous meeting. I certainly look forward to the next one! :) 

Three photos from the meeting: 

On the first photo we are too stiff... like trees :)
Ivan Delchev is the high man with white-grey shirt.
+Georgi Stankov shows how to express emotions :)
Well.. that's it.

Monday, 5 November 2012

The Chronicle: Team meeting # 1 (November 4th, 2012)

by: Georgi Stankov

At the moment we have discussed these topics:

Goal: our study aims to explore the degrees of separation via online social networks.

Methodology: Still many things are unclear, but there is a certain progress:
  • We will use Facebook as a primary environment for the experiment. 
  • Participants should exclude other participants as their 1st degree (with other words, Yanko can't give the message to Selime, Kito, or anybody from the group). 
  • Each participant should share the link with only one person, which we define as "close enough to ask him/her for a favor." We think of a certain level of non-formal relationship - people should talk to each other on a first name, and so on. 
  • We'll use media - video and message -to reach next degrees.
Comparison: we could compare a national and international level of interaction. For instance: how many degrees are needed to reach a person from Bulgaria (e.g. Tutrakan), and how many degrees are needed to reach a person abroad (e.g. Italy or Singapore). 

We made SWOT analysis and set smart-goals to see better the situation with its positives and negatives, and also to imagine if we are able to manage it.  

Next tasks
Pre-test: Also we decided that we could make a pre-test  in order to assess how our methodology works. This means that we will make a small experiment only with the members of the group, so we'll see the (probable) weaknesses of our experiment and we'll correct them before the real experiment!  

Yes, guys! I really believe that great things lie ahead!

First words, Six degrees...

by: Georgi Stankov

Stanley Milgram
(1933 - 1984)
On 28th of October 2012 we were having a class at Open School of Psychology. We were discussing social roles, social atomsocial networks, and sociogram as a tool to make a graphic representation of social links that a person has.

I taught about the "small world phenomenon" - the famous social networks' experiment of Stanley Milgram. He found out that between two distinct - not only physically, but also socially - persons there are average six steps, or six degrees of separation. For instance, Bill could reach Tim in six steps (1'st - acquaintance, 2nd - acquaintance's acquaintance, 3rd - acquaintance of acquaintance's acquaintance, and so on). Then I suggested to the group members that we could revisit and retest Milgram's experiment, by using today's online social networks.

And the story began...